A Postscript of the November 2018 Elections and a Recap of the December 04, 2018 City Council Meeting

This section of the agenda allows members of the public to address the City Council on any item NOT otherwise on the agenda. Members of the public, when recognized by the Mayor, should come forward to the lectern, and identify themselves. Comments are normally limited to three (3) minutes. In accordance with State Open Meeting Laws, no action will be taken by the City Council this evening. For items which are on the agenda this evening members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the City Council as each item is brought up for discussion. – From every City Council Meeting Agenda I can remember.

Some things just seem to go together:

· Hot dogs and Mustard

· Pie and Ice Cream

· Chips and Dip

· Burger and Fries

· Livingston and allegations of Election Fraud – From – Damned If You Do-Damned if You Don’t – November 2018

Livingston California: 12/15/2018

A POSTSCRIPT TO THE ELECTIONS OF 2018

Allegations of election fraud, sign theft and/or other political shenanigans have been part and parcel of Livingston politics for as long as I can remember. This time around was not much different.

I’ve heard allegations about 

  • A candidate’s business partner working the polls

  • A candidate’s daughter volunteering at the polls

  • A candidate’s parent crossing into the 100 foot buffer zone in an effort to “help” other people vote.

  • And a photo making the rounds in Facebook: claiming that a candidate was hanging out “at the polls”

Just to name a few. But I am going talk a little about on just one of the complaints:  the complaint about a candidate hanging out “at the polls”. When I looked at the photo in question I noticed the location: the corner of F and Prusso.

Most of us, when we see or hear the words “at the”, usually visualize someone or something really, really close to something. Like: at the door. Close. Very. Very. Close.

The words “at the polls”, also implies candidates are doing something they ought not be doing on Election Day: like standing so close to the polling station doors they could reach out and knock.  

Candidates and their supporters are not supposed to be that close to the polls on election day.There is a 100ft buffer zone around the polls that day. Candidate’s or their supporters Crossing into the buffer zone for some last minute electioneering that day is against the rules.

But, if we grant that the word “at” could be synonymous with “nearby”, “somewhat close too”, “relatively close to”, or “somewhat close by” to the polls, than there were not one but 2 teams of offenders that were “at” the polls.

  • #TeamMcCabe: located on the corner of F and Prusso and

  • #TeamSamra located on Prusso, directly across the street from the polling station located at the Child Development Center.

I wondered if either of these gathering sites could possibly be considered within the 100 foot buffer zone. So, I went to the Child Development Center the day after the Elections and, starting from the Center’s front doors, “paced” them off. Granted, it might have been more precise if I had actually taken a measuring tape along. But, as near as I could tell, neither gathering site violated the 100ft buffer zone rule.

Although there may well have been other Election Day Rules bent or broken that day, (that I have not been able to verify personally), the locations at which each “political team” was set up did not appear to break the 100ft Buffer Zone Rule.

Election Results were as follows

  • Mayor: Gurpal Samra, 36% 0f votes cast

  • Council Member (4 yr term): Raul Garcia, 16% of votes cast

  • Council Member (4 yr term): Gagandeep Kang, 16% of votes cast

  • Council Member (2 yr term): Maria Baptista-Soto, 15% of votes cast

Election Results

A BRIEF RECAP OF THE DECEMBER 04 2018 CITY COUNCIL

This is not meant to be an entire record of everything that was said or done that evening. For that, you can watch the entire meeting on YouTube by clicking on the following link =>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc9FrnjlqBA 

This post highlights some of the things that caught my attention: some of which, I think, give glimpses into the political alliances which were forged during the Election Cycle and seem to live on in the New Council.  

The December 04, 2018 City Council Meeting saw the Declaration of the Results of the November 6, 2018 General Municipal Election and the seating of the newly elected council members. There was the Presentation of Colors by the Police Explorers Group, and the new Mayor and Council Members were sworn in.

Appointments of Council Members to various Boards and Commissions was postponed to a future meeting: to give the New Council Members time to figure out which Boards and/or Commissions interested them.

After the swearing in, one of the first things the New Mayor did was state that, (now that the elections were over), we are all “friends” as soon as we walk through the Chamber Doors, and should not “personalize” things.

The first step down this rosy road to friendship and political fairness was to elect the newly elected Raul Garcia as Mayor Pro Temp over the more experienced Juan Aguilar Jr. (who had also run for the position of mayor). Juan Aguilar Jr. was nominated for Mayor Pro-Temp by councilmember Maria Baptista-Soto. But that nomination died for lack of a second.

There was a presentation and Renewal of Oath by the Police Explorers Unit. Then, the Police Foundation presented their donation of Ford Transit XLT to the PD. After that, it was time for “Announcements and Reports” by the County Supervisor, City Staff, and City Council Members.

It was at this point that the New Mayor announced the second step down the road to fairness and political fair play by declaring “I do not allow” public comments or questions about City Staff Reports given during this part of the meeting.

These “Announcements and Reports” by City Staff, he stated, were to the council. The audience would be free to listen to these reports from City Staff, but would not be allowed to ask questions or make comments until the Citizens’ Comments portion of the meeting. If the County Supervisor wanted to invite responses or questions, that was his prerogative, but members of the audience would not be allowed to comment or ask questions about Reports presented by City Staff at that time.

(This declaration signaled a substantial shift in attitude towards Public Comments by members of the audience. While other Mayors may have taken a more democratic and liberal approach to Public Comments: allowing the audience as many opportunities as possible; Mayor Samra appears to have a much more autocratic and restrictive view of public commenting.)

Announcements and Reports this evening included:

  • Public Works

  • The Recreation Department

  • and the City Manager.

The City Manager’s reports included several major changes and projects on Livingston’s horizon, including:

  • An Industrial Laundry service which has officially taken over the old Fresenius Building

  • A group of investors had purchased the 30+ acres near Hammett and Campbell. Another Truck Stop is on the plans in addition to the AM/PM that has already been approved.

  • Along the B Street corridor, there are discussions about a mixed use commercial project with senior housing: which would compliment the Medical Campus which should open in Spring.

  • Funding will be available to redo the Winton Parkway exchange

  • The City is looking at projects for the Next cycle of CMAQ money.

The only Public Hearing for the evening was Resolution Approving Site Plan and Design Review the New Microbiology Laboratory Project within the Foster Farms Plant Complex. At first, it seemed the project might be postponed to a future meeting, as the new Mayor Pro-Temp stated he’d like a little more time to go over the Staff Reports and documents. However, after more discussion, the Site Plan and Design Review was approved.

A Contract for Traffic Signal Maintenance Services to St. Francis Electric was also awarded that evening.

So You Think You Can Govern in 2018

Livingston California 10/22/2018

Oh Come ON guys Next to the MEMORIAL for cryin out loud Edited

Cheese Louise Guys! Did you have to put those things that close to the Memorial?!?

A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation. James Freeman Clarke

Historically, Livingston City Council elections have been rather sedate. Over the past 15 years or so, however, the campaigns have become filthy and juvenile. – Mike McGuire – Editor of the Livingston Chronicle from 1984-1996

One of the more challenging things about being a city councilman is learning change takes time. You can’t achieve everything you want overnight. You won’t win every battle. Small victories and steps lead to success. Learn to be patient. – Alex McCabe – Council member: June 2015 to present.

Air gaps are used in places where silicon chips are manufactured because arsenic and other poisonous chemicals are used, Boyce said.  “(With arsenic) one part per billion could kill you,” he said. “You use an air gap because the threat is so significant.” – Randy Boyce: Foster Farms General Council – Thursday Jul 13th, 2006Foster Farms in Livingston Threatened with Water Shut-off by City; Judge to Decide – Original Article by Merced Sun Star – Reposted by Indybay.org (Emphasis, mine)

The city’s arsenic levels exceeded the state’s maximum contaminant level of 0.010 parts per million numerous times in 2009, 2012 and 2013, according to the court documents. The latest levels were recorded as 0.013 parts per million April 9 and 0.011 parts per million April 30.  – MAY 15, 2014 – Nonprofit sues Livingston over drinking water –By Ramona Giwargis

If you do the right thing for the wrong reasons, the work becomes corrupted, …and ultimately self-destructive. – Lennier – Babylon5 – “Comes the Inquisitor”

“Belief can be manipulated. Knowledge is dangerous” Paul “Muad’Dib” Atreides of the Dune Series

Livingston CA – 10/22/2016.

Here we go again, just a few short days away from another General Election.  I’ll talk about the “sign thing” a little later. But, for now, time to add another chapter in the twisty saga of our own City Council and the goings on at City Hall: which includes the never-ending discussion about What’s-In-Our-Water and Will-It-Eventually-Hurt-You.

What I have learned over the years is that the answer to those questions often depends upon which council member/or lawyer is talking, and what political or financial outcome s/he is seeking now. Case in point: whether 1 Part-Per-Billion of Arsenic can kill you.

Livingston has wells that produce water with Arsenic levels that exceed 0.013 Parts Per Million. If you convert 0.o13 Parts Per Million into Parts Per Billion, you get 13 Parts per Billion.

The State/Federal Maximum Contaminant Level for Arsenic is 10 Parts Per Billion. However, depending on who you talk to, or what the litigation is about, the Arsenic levels in Livingston’s water may or may not be an issue or may or may not make you sick.

Every couple of years I take advantage of The Story Teller’s License. The result is not an All-Inclusive History of Everything That Happened over the Last Few Years: just my general Kvetch about the way I see “Politics” playing out every couple of years or so in Livingston.

If you click HERE, and look over in the Right-Hand Margin of my original Blog, you will find plenty of links to loads of information about the continuing discussion about How-Much-Arsenic-Can-Hurt-You, and others such as:

When I wrote the first “So You Think You Can Govern”, I’d been somewhat of a local political junkie for a couple of years prior to the 2008 Elections and I was concerned about the number of candidates whose faces I hadn’t recalled having seen at City Council meetings (or Planning Commission meetings, or Citizens Advisory Committee meetings when they still had them).

At the time, it was already clear to me that there were sitting Council Members who did not bother to read the material in their Agenda Packets, did not understand the significance of the long term effect of what they were voting on, were incapable of stringing together a coherent sentence, and/or were just “there” for reasons of their own.

I was also concerned that some of the people seeking to replace them didn’t have a clue as to what they would be getting themselves into. Livingston was going through several changes; had been on the “back end” of at least one very expensive lawsuit; was already enmeshed in a long, drawn out expensive mess of a General Plan Update and had already been through at least one Water Rate Study.

The General Election of 2008 came and went.And although there was a Council Meeting or two where everyone seemed to be willing to hold hands and sing Kumbya, it didn’t take to terribly long thereafter before the Political Cat Fighting began.

Well, the Recall Election of August 31, 2010 came and went: Theresa Land (Recall Candidate) displaced Martha Natares as Council Person and Council Person Rodrigo Espinoza, (Recall Candidate), displaced Daniel Varela as Mayor. Warren Urnberg, (Recall Supporter), was appointed as Temporary Council Member until the results of the General Election 0f November 2010 were tabulated.

Gurpal Samra, (Recall Proponent), won that “temporarily filled” Council Seat during the General Election in November of 2010 and Rodrigo Espinoza also kept his seat as Mayor.

clip_image002And, as before, there were people on the council who clearly didn’t bother to read the material in their Agenda Packets, didn’t really seem to know the difference between a “Commission” and a “Department”; were even more openly hostile towards City Staff,  didn’t seem to know what an Auditor was for; didn’t understand the significance of the long term effect of what they were voting on, were incapable of speaking in coherent sentences; and/or were just “there” for God Only Knows what reason of their own.

And, as you can see from the graph above, Livingston’s financial situation started going to Hell in a Hand Basket. Rapidly.

The Elections of 2012 came and went. Mayor Pro Temp Margarita Aguilar had decided not to run again for office. Council Person Frank Vierra, also decided against running for another term on the Council.

During the Campaign of 2012, it became clear that relationships between some of the once Staunch Allies Of The Recall had begun to fray. Council Person Teresa Land, who had campaigned heavily for the Recall and Recall Committee backed candidates, found that she no longer had the support of those she had helped gain office.

Mayor Espinoza, instead, joined forces with Arturo Sacairos.  As Reported in the Merced Sun StarBefore the election, Espinoza released fliers endorsing himself and several other local candidates, including contenders for the Livingston council, city clerk, city treasurer, county supervisor, assembly and congress. Everyone he endorsed won.…….Espinoza put out the flier jointly with Sicairos, who said the flier might’ve helped him win, since a lot of Livingston voters look for guidance around election time”

{Before we go further, let’s take a brief Side Trip to map out a few familial relationships while we are here.

  • The City Clerk, Tony Silva is/was City Council Member Arturo Sacairos’, Father-in-law.
  • The City Treasurer, Maria Riberio, is the City Clerk’s Sister}

So three “newcomers” took their places as City Council Members, with Rodrigo Espinoza as Mayor and Gurpal Samra as Mayor Pro Temp. {and with 3 people with “family ties” holding the positions of City Clerk, City Treasurer, and City Councilperson}

And there were still those on the council who clearly didn’t bother to read the material in their Agenda Packets, didn’t really seem to know the difference between a “Commission” and a “Department”, didn’t understand the significance of the long term effect of what they were voting on, were incapable of speaking in coherent sentences; and/or were just “there” for God Only Knows what reason of their own.

And although most of that crop of newly Elected Officials didn’t “beat up” on City Staff quite as much as Previous Council Members did, it seemed mainly because there was fewer “City Staff” to browbeat or blame for the City’s ills. Most of those who had openly suffered the Wrath-of-Council-Members-Past were either replaced, retired, fired, or otherwise laid off due to a “reorganization” dictated by an ever shrinking budget.

Then came General Election of 2014 and it became clear that relationships between the core of the Recall Coalition had fractured even further. Mario Mendoza: Treasurer of the Recall Committee, (and brother to Council Person David Mendoza) tried to unseat Mayor Pro Temp Gurpal Samra. As usual, Things got “just a tad” ugly in the process. (Adanan Bath also took out papers to run against Gurpal, but pulled out of the race and ended up being appointed to the Planning Commission)

After the election, the City Council consisted of the following:

  • Rodrigo Espinoza (Mayor),
  • Gurpal Samra (Mayor Pro-Temp),
  • David Mendoza (Brother of Mario Mendoza)
  • Arturo Saciaros,
  • Jim Soria.

2014 – 2016 did not lack for its share of political/financial turmoil and Water Quality Issues:

  • There was the flap about Favoritism and how Fireworks Booth Permits should be distributed.
  • Due to circumstances beyond his control, Council Member David Mendoza had to resign and was eventually replaced by Alex McCabe.
  • The City Manager bailed by January 2015, and was was eventually “replaced” by a New City Manager who only managed to last a couple of months.
  • Same with Livingston’s Public Works Directors. They seemed to come and go even more quickly than the City Managers did.
  • And although “adjustment” to water rates, was eventually adopted, many necessary repairs and upgrades to the Water Delivery System were expected to be paid for through State/Federal Grants and loans.
  • Well #16, a well designed initially to be a “back up well”, eventually was pressed into “full time” service while Well #14 was removed from service (Temporarily?) due to high TCP levels.

In the past, the “official” City Council mantra about Water Quality was, “We’re aware. Everything is fine. It may be “brown” sometimes but it’s Nothing to Worry about here. If anyone says different, they’re just making trouble”

Then it became “Nothing really new here. No surprises, really. We’re just in the same troubles as everyone else, because of the Drought.”

But, it was one emergency well repair after another. Even Foster Farms recognized that it was in its best interest to help out the City with a repair or two in order to keep the water flowing. It is also worthy of note that the first well upgraded with a TCP Filtration System was a well used primarily to help deliver water to Foster Farms.

Remember that Settlement the City Received from Dow Chemical Company, from the lawsuit started back in 2005 over elevated levels of TCP in Livingston’s water? That was dipped into several times over the years for “water related” projects. (Not all of them TCP related) There is still a boatload of work to be done to upgrade and repair our Water Delivery System. A recent Staff Report indicated that if things go as planned on the State/Federal level, ALL of our well would be Out Of Compliance with the new TCP-1,2,3 Maximum Contaminant level that was ex[pected to be adopted in the near future.

In 2016, 4 seats were in play: the office of Mayor and THREE council seats. Mario Mendoza gave it another try. So did Adanan Bath. Alex McCabe and Arturo Sacairos  both tried to hang on to their seats for another term. As usual there were the “political newbies” to add to the Mix: Wapinder Kang, Jason Roth, and Juan Aguilar, Jr. .

Jim Soria was on the Ballot for Mayor. (Mayor Espinoza Moved On to The Board of Supervisors) There was also a Write in Candidate for Mayor: Rosalinda Ruiz 

And once again, we had Candidates for Office who had hardly ever shown up for City Council meetings since the previous election.

And we were still looking for a new City Manager……

And we were still looking for a new Public Works Director…..

And there was still Litigation in progress: on more than one front, and we had still not yet fixed that mess of a General Plan Update that has already cost the taxpayers of the Livingston hundreds of thousands of dollars in Court Fees, Attorney’s fees, Consultant’s Fees, and wasted Staff Time: Although it still seamed squarely on the back burner for the time being.

In 2016, After all the votes were counted, Jim Soria won the Mayor’s seat by a significant margin. As for the Council seats: that’s where things got a little more “complicated”. Results for the race for Council were as follows:
clip_image003

Which meant

  • That Juan Aguilar Jr. was elected for a four year term
  • That Wapinder Kang was elected for a four year term, and
  • That Arturo Sacairos was elected for a two year term.
  • Alex McCabe was in 4th place
  • Mario Mendoza placed 5th
  • And so on down the line

However, it was discovered that Wapinder Kang could not be sworn in as Councilmember and keep his job with the Livingston Police Department: According to Government Code 53227.  (a)

Council Member-Elect Kang chose to remain as a Livingston Police Officer: opening up a vacancy on the Council. On January 17, 2017, the Council appointed Alex McCabe fill the Vacancy

Some of the Agenda Items taken up by this new council included:

Busy, Busy Couple of years. The next couple of years could get even busier.

This year, again, there are  4 seats on the Council up for grabs.

  • Mayor – Currently held by Jim Soria
  • 3 Council Members – Currently held by Gurpal Samra, Alex McCabe and Arturo Sacairos

Endorsed by County Suprvisor EspinosaLivingston’s Mayor Jim Soria did not file for re-election. Competing for the Mayor’s sear are Juan Aguilar Jr., Alex McCabe, Gurpal Samra, and Mario Luera.

Alex McCabe and Gary Gurpreet SingArturo Sacairos also decided against running again. There are nine candidates for the three seats on the Council: Jay Abrams, Jason Roth, Gagandeep Kang, Mucio Vera Jr., Elias Jesus Maldonado III, Garry Gurpreet Singh, Raul T. Garcia, Roberto Godinez and Maria Baptista-Soto.

Some of the candidates seem to have their own Political Pacts and Partnerships. Others, more or less, flying solo. Some are actively endorsed by County Supervisor Espinosa (who happens to be dealing with an alleged #metoo moment). Others, not so much.

And  again we have Candidates for Office who have never, or hardly ever shown up for City Council meetings since the last election.

I wonder if they really know what they are getting themselves into. Some Agenda Packets can be 500 pages or more. Sometimes meetings go until almost Midnight.

Not to mention that whoever is elected this time will have to contend with how to acquire multi millions of dollars for necessary upgrades to the Water Delivery System and the “politics” of a new Water Rate Study/Proposition 218 Hearing.

That General Plan Update still seems to be on the back burner BTW.

“Dirty Politics” seems to have become the Norm, not the Exception in Livingston. If you have lived here long enough, you know what I mean.

Political SignsAmong other things, I’ve heard about sign’s being stolen, signs parked on City Property/Right of ways, and similar locations, and signs taking up at least three parking spaces in the Downtown Commercial District. In years past, sign issues had been a BIG deal with certain candidates. Looks like were getting more of the same this time around.

Signs of the times (sigh) 

So…about those Campaign Signs in Memorial Park: those that had been parked very close to the Memorial itself.

Livingston War MemorialSome people don’t seem to think it’s such a big deal. I disagree. The purpose of the Memorial is to preserve the memory of those who died in war overseas: not to serve as side dressing for a political campaign.

It’s one thing to plop a few campaign signs into the ground at Memorial Park and call it “Campaign Headquarters” for a day. It’s quite another to park some of those signs within spitting distance of the Memorial itself.

That just boggles my mind.

And I may not be the only Old Fogy in town who feels that way.

I said it before, and I’ll say it again now, the Ethical and Effective Council Member of the 21stCentury will need to be more than just a person who sits behind a dais and votes “yes or no”. S/he must be able to comprehend, analyze and distinguish between a multitude of competing interests, knowing that all decisions made will have implications for the future.

S/he must recognize that the issues facing Livingston won’t just impact those living within “the City”. There are those outside the City Limits and Sphere of Influence that are as important to the cultural and economic health of Livingston as those who live “inside”.

An ethical and effective Council Person must be fully aware of present needs, and yet have an eye for the future consequences of any and all actions taken, votes cast, and directions given to City Staff in the present. S/he must understand both the “the Time Value of Money” and the “Money Value of Time”: spending both taxpayers dollars, and City Staff time wisely and well.

I have included a partial list of terms any competent council person should be aware of, understand, and able to use in a complete, coherent sentence.

For anyone who REALLY wants to be knowledgeable about how City Government works, I would strongly suggest s/he get out a dictionary, do an Internet Search, or talk to someone at City Hall about any of these terms/concepts s/he may never have heard of before. Granted, it’s only an abbreviated list: an “Introduction to 21st Century City Government 101” so to speak, but at least it would give you an idea of the kinds of stuff you would need to know so you don’t end up sounding like a damn-fool every time you open your mouth .

And now…some of those Terms to Know

PRIMARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS address health concerns. (Things in the water that can make you sick or kill you if you drank enough of it over time)

SECONDARY DRINKING WATER STANDARDS – (things that make the water look and smell yucky, but might not necessarily make you sick or kill you)established to address issues of aesthetics (discoloration), not health concerns. In California secondary MCLs (Maximum Contaminant Levels) are enforceable.

UNREGULATED CONTAMINANTS – Chemicals and stuff which do not yet have a Maximum Contaminant Level. (emphasis on “yet”) There is ongoing testing So the The Environmental Protection Agency can decide whether or not these contaminants occur often enough and at high enough levels to warrant further attention and/or regulation. (In other words, the Government is still debating the science about how much of that stuff will make you sick or kill you over time.)

ARSENIC – : a semi-metal element in the periodic table. It is odorless and tasteless. It enters drinking water supplies from natural deposits in the earth or from agricultural and industrial practices.

CHROMIUM – 3 An Essential Trace Mineral, not to be confused with it’s deadlier cousin: Chromium – 6.

CHROMIUM – 6:  Chromium-6, or hexavalent chromium, is a naturally occurring metal. It is also used in several industrial processes. Chromium-6 has been known to cause cancer in humans when inhaled. In scientific studies in laboratory animals, chromium-6 has also been linked to cancer when ingested (Think “Erin Brokovich”)

MANGANESE: Manganese is a pinkish-gray, chemically active element. it is one out of three toxic essential trace elements, which means that it is not only necessary for humans to survive, but it is also toxic when too high concentrations are present in a human body. When people do not live up to the recommended daily allowances their health will decrease. But when the uptake is too high health problems will also occur. (Not getting enough? You get sick. Getting “too much”? You get sick)

TCP – 1,2,3:  TCP-containing fumigants were used extensively by farmers in the production of a large variety of crops from the 1950s through the mid-1980s. In California, these fumigants (known by the trade names D-D and Telone) were among the most widely used pesticides in the history of the State, second only to sulfur…. In 1999, 1,2,3-TCP was added to the list of chemicals known to the state to cause cancer (Livingston sued Dow Chemical and netted about $9.5 million dollars to put towards removing the TCP from our Drinking Water )

mg/L: Milligrams per liter or Parts Per Million.

ug/L: Micrograms per liter or Parts Per Billion, (ppb).

Parts per Billion, (ppb) – Imagine 13 drops of ink in one of the largest tanker trucks used to haul gasoline. That would be 13 Parts Per Billion of ink.

MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level – The highest level of a toxic substance allowed in Drinking Water. The Health & Safety Code §116365(a) requires California Department of Public Health to establish a contaminant’s MCL at a level as close to its PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL (PHG) as is technologically and economically feasible, placing primary emphasis on the protection of public health

  • If a toxic substance is higher than the Maximum Contaminant Level using a 4 QUARTER AVERAGE, a water purveyor has to figure out a way of reducing that number down to below the MCL, and/or come up with another source of water to deliver to it’s customers.
  • The Maximum Contaminant Level for Arsenic currently stands at 10 Parts Per Billion
  • We have at least 2 wells that are over the limit of 10 Parts Per Billion and others that are really close to going over that limit.

4 QUARTER AVERAGE: As is this example.

  • If quarterly testing for arsenic at Well A produced the following results in Parts Per Billion: 8.5, 9.9 , 10, 11
  • The 4 Quarter Average would be 9.85 Parts Per Billion.

RANGE: The Lowest and the Highest. Using the Above as our example,

  • The Range would be 8.5 – 11 Parts Per Billion

NOTIFICATION LEVEL – The level at which the State of California says the public needs to be notified about a contaminant in the Drinking Water

  • The Notification Level for TCP – 1,2,3 is 0.005 ug/L( 0.005 Parts per Billion)
  • I’m not to crazy about decimals. So to “get rid” of the decimal, we move the decimal 3 places to the right and get 5 Parts per Trillion.
  • According to the Report by Kennedy Jenks, a significant number of Livingston’s wells produce water with TCP ABOVE the Notification Level.

Parts per Trillion (ppt):– Imagine 5 drops of detergent in enough dishwater to fill a string of railroad tank cars ten miles long. That would be 5 Parts Per Trillion of detergent.

RESPONSE LEVEL – The level of contamination at which the State of California says a well “should” be removed from service because of a potential threat to Public Health.

PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL –  Concentrations of drinking water contaminants that pose no significant health risk if consumed for a lifetime, based on current risk assessment principles, practices, and methods.(Translation: levels low enough that you should die of old age before any of that stuff would make you really sick or kill you)


1,2,3, TCP

Industrial

A-1 Zoning

Industrial Wastewater

AB 1234

Infrastructure

Allowed Use

Joint Use

Assessed Property Values

LAFCO

Audit

Light Industrial

Audit Report

Litigation

Bank Owned Properties

Long-Term Debt Obligations

Benefit Assessment District

Low Density Residential

Breach of Contract

MAGPI

Brown Act

Master Plan

Budget

Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)

California Public Records Act

MCAG

Capital Improvements

Medium Density Residential

Capital Projects Fund

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Cash Pool

Mitigated Negative Declaration

Centralized Water Treatment

Mixed Use

CEQA

Modified Accrual Method of Accounting

Citizens Advisory Committee

Municipal Code

Citizens Service Committee

Notice of Action

City Limits

Notice of Violation

City Manager Form of Government

Notice of Preparation (NOP)

Closed Session

Notification Level

Code

Nuisance Abatement

Code Enforcement Officer

Obligation Payment Schedule

COLA

Open Meetings Law

Commercial

Open Session

Commission

Open Space Reserve

Common Sense

Operating Deficit

Community

Operation and Maintenance

Community Commercial

Ordinance

Community Development Block Grant

Percolation ponds

Community Facilities District

Permitted Use

Community Service

Planning Commission

Community Values

Prevailing Union Wage Law

Community Vision

Primary Drinking Water Standards

Confidentiality

Proposition 218 Hearing

Conflict of Interest

Public Comments

Consent Calendar

Public Document Request

Constituent

Qualified Audit Opinion

Contract

Quorum

Cooperation

Recusal

Department

Redevelopment Area

Development Impact Fees

Reflective Listening

Detection Level

Regional Sewage Treatment Facility

Domestic Wastewater

Response to the Grand Jury

Easements

Restricted Fund

Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF)

Retainer

Enterprise Zone

Revenue

Environmentally Superior Alternative

Revenue Sharing

Errors and Omissions

right-of-way

Excused Absence

Secondary Drinking Water Standards

Expenditure

Serial Meeting

Fiduciary Funds

Shared Use

Fiduciary Responsibility

Site Design Review

Fiscal Impact

Special Planning Area

Fiscal Year

Special Revenue Fund

Fixed Assets

Sphere of Influence

Form 700

Strike expense

Fund

Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency

Fund Balance

Tax Sharing Agreement

General Fund

The Illegal 42′ Sewer Pipe

General Plan

Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP)

Union

Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB)

Unqualified Audit Opinion

Government Code

Unrestricted Fund

Grand Jury Report

Urban Reserve

Grievance

Warrant Register

Hearing

Wellhead Treatment

Heritage Tree Ordinance

Work in Lieu

High Density Residential

Workers Compensation

Highway Commercial

 

One last thing. Please Mr./Ms. Council People of the future: when you do speak, please finish your first sentence before beginning a totally different one. Trying to follow some of the rambling trains of thought I hear regularly at Council Meetings gives me a headache.

Thank You.

City of Livingston to Adopt Code of Ethics (maybe) and an Anti Bullying Proclamation

The Grand Jury strongly believes that this report as well as last year’s report should be taken as a cautionary note to the new members of the Council. They can profit from a bad example. We also strongly urge the City Manager and City Attorney to brief the new City Council Members on their legal roles and responsibilities as well as give the carry over City Council Members a refresher course on these issues. – Excerpted from: Postscript to FY2007/2008 Grand Jury’s Report On The City of Livingston

WHEREAS, protection from abusive work environments should apply to every worker, and not be limited to legally protected class status based only on race, color, gender, national origin, age, or disability. – Excerpted from: Proclamation Declaring October 14-20, 2018 as “Freedom from Workplace Bullies Week”.

IMPROPER INFLUENCE: Public Officials and City Employees shall refrain from using their position to improperly influence the deliberations or decisions of City staff, Boards, Commission, Committees or City Council.

COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT: Everyone shall respect and adhere to the Council-Manager structure of the City of Livingston City Government as provided for under State and local law. Excerpts from: City of Livingston Code of Ethics – Council Meeting Date: 9/18/18

Livingston California: 09/16/2018

At the September 18, 2018 City Council Meeting, the City Council will, once again take up the topic of a Code of Ethics. The last time I remember this topic coming up with any degree of seriousness was back in February of 2012.  After a lengthy discussion, direction was given that staff revise the document and bring it back to the Council for consideration.

It seems, attempts at revisions went by the wayside and slipped into the realm of Political Limbo: the place where things are postponed as long as possible or eventually forgotten. Jose Antonio Ramirez, City Manager and author of the drafted Code of Ethics, eventually decided to resign “out of the blue”around December of 2014. 

After a couple of years of not being able to hire and retain a “permanent” City Manager for more than two months or so, Livingston managed to coax Mr. Ramirez back into the City Manager’s Chair in May, 2017.

Now that Mr. Ramirez has been back for a while, and there have been a few “new faces” on the City Council since the first Ethics-go-round, he might be thinking the timing is right to get a Code of Ethics on the books.

(Yes. I know. Elected Officials are supposed to take Ethics Training. But, some of Livingston’s elected officials have already been the subject of at least one Grand Jury Investigation for harassing, intimidating, and otherwise messing with how City Employees do their jobs.)

Now that we are only a few short weeks away from another General Election, we’ll get to see if a Code of Ethics is actually adopted on Tuesday, postponed until after the elections in November, or once again dropped into Political Limbo for a few more years.

BTW. Shouldn’t “Freedom from Workplace Bullies” be a year-round thing?

The Journey Continues…and why I do what I do

Thanks for joining me in the continuing saga of the Political Goings on at the City of Livingston, California. This is a Continuation of what began around 2007 or so in my original site:The Gardening Snail

Much more like another shelled creature, the Hermit Crab, I eventually outgrew the amount of Storage Space allowed in my original Digital Home. (free does have its limitations). So here I am, building a new “Home”

Good company in a journey makes the way seem shorter. — Izaak Walton

post